
Transit Times, vol. 30, no. 2, April 2016
PAGE 6
Making Vision Zero Work in
Montgomery County
by Wendy Leibowitz
Vision Zero is a goal to eliminate traffic fatalities by a
specific date. Vision Zero is a paradigm shift: instead
of prioritizing a cost-benefit analysis to building more
roads or speeding traffic along, Vision Zero prioritizes
that no traffic fatalities be acceptable. Planners and the
public must take that mind-set and apply it to every
traffic situation. Vision Zero was born in Sweden. U.S.
cities that have adopted Vision Zero include Austin,
Boston, Chicago, Fort Lauderdale, Los Angeles, New
York City, Portland, San Diego, San Francisco, San
Jose, San Mateo, Santa Barbara, Seattle, Washington,
DC.
The County’s Pedestrian, Bike, and Traffic Safety Ad
-
visory Committee (PBTSAC) met on February 4, 2016
to discuss the concept and consider the best paths
forward (pun not intended). Al Roshdieh, newly ap-
pointed head of Montgomery County’s Department of
Transportation, attended the entire meeting, appeared
interested, and asked many questions. The rest of this
article is about what transpired at the first meeting on
Vision Zero in Montgomery County.
The Chair of the PBTSAC launched the meeting with
a look at snow removal issues, which is relevant to
Vision Zero. Vision Zero sees us all as “people on
the move” – whether by car, bike, or on foot. In the
context of Vision Zero, snow removal should not
prioritize vehicular traffic over pedestrian movement.
However, County snow plows continue to clear snow
from roadways by piling it up on sidewalks, where it
may not melt for weeks, forcing pedestrians to walk in
the roadway. In some cases, residents had cleared their
sidewalks, only to find the County snow plows putting
back snow from roadways onto sidewalks. When snow
is removed, it should be REMOVED, not just moved
from roadways to sidewalks. The needs of pedestrians
must be heeded.
The County Council seems to support the Vision Zero
Resolution; it unanimously agreed to study the matter,
with a report due in October 2016. I spoke before the
committee about the importance of a specific deadline
to attain Vision Zero. A deadline would help focus
efforts and measure success. Although the Swedes
missed their first deadline for Vision Zero, they now
are on Vision Zero 2.0. Usually deadlines are about
10 years out although Seattle’s deadline is 15 years
(2030).
The PBTSAC then examined how crashes can be
avoided. The first traffic fatality in Montgomery
County this year was a 67 year-old woman, struck and
killed by a Ride-On bus, while crossing Old George-
town Road at Battery Lane, in a crosswalk with a
green light. The police have not yet issued a report on
the fatality caused by the Ride-On bus.
Next, ACT Board member Sean Emerson presented
an up-to-date crash map, tracking all traffic crashes in
the county. A County police officer noted Sean’s map
was more up-to-date than the officer’s own map. Then,
Sean showed the PBTSAC personal videos of attempts
to cross a street in Silver Spring and how the flash-
ing lights marking a crosswalk are ignored by drivers.
This observation was referenced later when the State
Highway Administration (SHA) said it was going to
install flashing lights at the dangerous crosswalk on
Veirs Mill Road, where a young cyclist was killed in
late 2015. The SHA was dumbfounded when it was
asked whether the blinking lights to be installed were
the one-second on/off lights ignored by drivers (as
Sean noted).
A representative of Washington, DC’s Vision Zero
showed off DC’s wonderful, crowd-sourced map
where people can report not just accidents, but “near
misses.” The map is online at http://visionzero.ddot.
dc.gov/VisionZero/. “Cyclists use this map a lot,” the
representative said. “It’s mobile-friendly, so people
without computers in their homes will use it as well.”
Another person noted that cell phones have jumped
the digital divide, and cell phone users can call in
data to the map easily and accurately, from the “spot.”
Washington, DC is also using “pop-up stands” to talk
to people about their experiences in different neigh-
borhoods (rather than holding hearings and hoping
people show up). Finally, DC holds “hack-a-thons,” to
engage people in using the enormous amounts of data
collected from DC’s “dynamic maps” to determine
how the data can help, instead of just letting it all sit
there, unused.
Concluding the PBTSAC meeting, a police officer
spoke of efforts in Annapolis to stiffen penalties for
drunk driving and reckless driving, in particular to